Mini-lecture on Wisdom of Crowds and Collective Intelligence
Collective Intelligence
Idea that groups can be smarter than the smartest person in the group
Sometimes it’s simple; e.g, aggregating information from multiple sources
Sometimes there is an emergent property, where the group thinks and behaves differently
Ants
Organizations
While organizations are much more hierarchical than ants, they can still have emergent properties
Partially a function of history, partially of the structure of the organization
Even a culture everyone dislikes can be hard to change
E.g., metric system, QWERTY keyboards
Cities
High-level decisions about zoning, infrastructure, etc. but the character of a city is emergent
Jane Jacobs: “The Death and Life of Great American Cities”
Wisdom of Crowds Activity
Get out a piece of paper
Guess how many pages are in this book and record your guess on the Google Form
Tell your guess (and no other information) to the two people on either side of you
Guess again how many pages are in the book and record it
Activity 2
Guess 3: Guess the pages in this book
Two random people will tell us their guess
Guess 4: Guess the pages again for this book
Collective understanding and decision-making
Wisdom of crowds is idea that in many contexts, the average is a really good guess!
What is groupthink? Have you seen examples? How might this relate?
Dr. Josh Becker et al. show that in some cases, communication can help
Those whose guesses are worst move the most
Divorced from other social relationships (not multiplex)
Results
Decentralized network
Centralized network
Connections to other network concepts
How does this relate to our week on small group networks?
Transactive memory
Hierarchy
Centralization
Diffusion and contagion
Connections to other network concepts
How could you design a group / network to get the benefits of the wisdom of crowds?
When would you expect a wisdom of crowds approach to work well?
When would you expect it to fail?
Discussion Questions
How are shared understanding and groupthink different? Shared understanding is framed positively and groupthink is framed negatively. Is there a difference, or are they just framed differently?
Can a group ever be more intelligent than its smartest member?
If decentralized networks improve accuracy, why do so many real-world systems (like social media, big companies, etc.) become highly centralized?
The experiments used examples with clear correct answers. How would the results change in situations where there is no “truth” (like political opinions, religious beliefs, etc.)?
Discussion Questions
In what situations, if any, is it better for a group to have a centrally influential leader rather than a more decentralized structure?
Do online groups show the same patterns of collective intelligence as in-person groups?
If you have high self-weight what are some ways you can notice this and balance it out so that you are not just stubborn and can grow? When are good times to have high self-weight and when are good times to have low self-weight?
Do you typically go to a select few people for advice and put lots of weight into what they say or take the wisdom of crowds approach go to many people and average out what feedback you get not really put much weight into the opinion of one other person?
Exam Review
Exam Review
Visualization / ggraph
Look at code and explain what it will look like
Find the bug in code
Example
What code produces this graph?
G |>mutate(centrality =centrality_degree()) |>activate(edges) |>ggraph() +geom_edge_fan(color ='purple') +geom_node_point(aes(size = centrality), color ='green')
Exam Review
What would this code do?
G |>activate(nodes) |>mutate(ec =centrality_eigen()) |>filter(ec >1) |>ggraph() +geom_edge_fan(color ='orange') +geom_node_point(aes(size = ec), color ='green')
Exam Review
Centrality
Network representations (Edgelists and matrices)
Network formation
Homophily, focus theory, transitivity, social exchange theory, etc.